Showing posts with label Barton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Barton. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 27, 2017

1792 High Rye Review

I'm going to start this review with my usual Barton disclaimer: I like their products more than most other folks seem to. I don't live in Kentucky so I don't have easy access to the crazy bang for your buck products like Heaven Hill Bottled in Bond 6 year. What I do have access to here though is Very Old Barton Bottled in Bond "6" and at $12 a bottle, that is easily the best whiskey value my money can regularly buy. Given my fondness for that product, it's been nice to see them branching out with quite a few special releases over the past couple of years - Port Finish, Sweet Wheat, Full Proof, and what we have here today, High Rye. I'm glad to see them pushing the envelope with different things but truth be told of all of those the High Rye sounded the least interesting to me. I personally didn't seek it out but when a friend spotted a bottle and asked if I wanted it, my Barton heart strings were tugged and I caved.
bottle
No Age Statement; 47.15% ABV; $46
Nose: Tingly rye menthol spice, a fair amount of ethanol heat, and a very familiar banana note that I typically taste and smell in Barton products. 
Taste: Some caramel/vanilla/honey wood sweets up front, then some spicy rye tingle in the back. That youthful Barton banana note is heavy handed, kind of like banana runts candy. The finish is mostly oak and wood related sweet flavors. It has a little spice kick in the form of anise and spearmint but I'm not really picking up a heavy rye presence. 
Thoughts: Of all the special release 1792 products, this one is my least favorite. It's pretty close in quality to the regular 1792 small batch in terms of age / wood depth and I don't think the high rye mashbill has added much of anything to make this special. It's not a bad bourbon per se but I find it exceptionally boring and average at best. In this price range for a Barton product, Full Proof is a much better value or if you wanted to go with a better high rye bourbon, stick to Four Roses Single Barrel.
Rating: C
Note that price is not considered when assigning a rating.

Sunday, September 11, 2016

1792 Full Proof Review

If you ask my opinion on the best bargain in bourbon available today, my answer is easy: Very Old Barton Bottled in Bond. It's certainly not the best but at $12 a bottle, it's an outstanding value. When you start to branch out from that bottle I think the rest of Barton products are decent enough but it appears I'm in the minority there. Back when we did the /r/bourbon community review of 1792 Small Batch, it was painfully obvious not many people cared for it. I can't quite get my head around why it did so poorly but I'm okay accepting the fact that I like Barton more than most people so keep that in mind as we proceed. 
bottle
No Age Statement (press release says 8.5 years); 62.5% ABV; $45
Nose: Smells a little young. I get some of the ripe banana notes that were prominent in the younger bottled in bond product. It noses very sweet, like a caramel banana sundae. You can certainly smell the 125 proof as it's pretty warm.
Taste: Upfront it is just like the nose - a hot caramel banana vanilla ice cream sundae. Towards the finish some leathery and tobacco notes come in showing some slight oak complexity. This tastes just like what I would expect from more proof and extra aging of the bottled in bond "6" product. 
Thoughts: This is pretty good. I doubt you will find a better (mostly) barrel proof bottle of whiskey in this price range on the shelf today. But like the bottled in bond product it is not without its flaws. When I first opened the bottle I thought it was brutally hot for the proof and occasionally I get some harsh char or untamed ethanol. It mellows out well with some airtime though and at the end of the day it's just a solid, uncomplicated bourbon with a lot of umpf. 
Rating: B-

Note that price is not considered when assigning a rating.

Friday, December 4, 2015

Barton 1792 Small Batch Review

This is another review I did as part of the /r/bourbon series of community reviews.
From my perspective, Barton is one of the better Kentucky distilleries that doesn’t get as much recognition as it should. Personally I am a huge fan of their Very Old Barton Bottled in Bond product which did very well in my Bottled in Bond bonanza. I happen to think that is the best bottle of whiskey you can buy for under $15. Barton also recently launched a couple of one-off products, 1792 Sweet Wheat which I liked well enough and 1792 Port Finished which I have yet to review but am enjoying a lot. Given all that, it stands to reason I should like their flagship product 1792 Small Batch as well.
bottle
No Age Statement; 46.85% ABV; $30
Nose: Very standard bourbon nose - typical caramel and vanilla sweets, moderate about of woody oak with just a little tannic complexity. It doesn’t smell as young as I expected and the heat is well tamed.
Taste: Yep, tastes like bourbon. No surprises here as it’s mostly a rehash of the nose. On the sweet side I find a little extra honey in the mix now and the finish has a little rye spice tingle. Again my biggest surprise is it doesn’t taste as young as I expected. Unlike the Bottle in Bond product which must be the product of distillate from the same season, I suspect this small batch is a mix of some older and younger barrels which I think has created a nice balance of younger grain forward fruity notes along with older more tannic complex wood notes.
Thoughts: This is about as standard of a bourbon as you can get. It’s not too woody, not too young, not too sweet, and not very bitter. It’s just an all around safe bourbon whiskey. That might be its biggest downfall though as that also makes it somewhat boring. If you are just looking for a good daily sipper this would fit that bill very nicely and I feel it’s just a notch above some of the other products near this price range like Wild Turkey 101 and Old Forester Signature though not as good as something like Henry McKenna or Eagle Rare.
Rating: B- / C+
Value: As always, I don’t factor cost into my ratings. Considering that I’ve paid almost double this price for whiskeys I’ve rated about the same, I think this a decent buy.

Monday, August 17, 2015

1792 Sweet Wheat Review

The bourbon circles were really surprised several months ago when news of an 8 year old wheated Bourbon from Barton emerged. Like most of the current whiskey crowd, I’m a fan of wheaters so I was really looking forward to something different and a little older than the other wheated products that regularly stock the shelves. Unfortunately what I thought would be an easy to find bottle ended up being the total opposite in my local market. Of my two preferred locals, one got shut out completely and the other store got a single bottle which I am reviewing here today.
bottle
No Age Statement (press release claimed 8 years); 45.6% ABV; $35; Distilled by Barton
I’m not one to usually care about packaging but I’d like to give a nod to Barton on their current label and bottle design. I really dig the retro modern look of this product.
Nose: Woody, dark fruits, a little spice zip, and some tannic bitter tea. Smells about right for 8 years. Alcohol is well tamed, smells spot on for the proof.
Taste: Nice but simple balance of sweet to oak. Finish tapers off with some darker tannic notes and less sweetness. Not complex beyond that at all but it really doesn’t need to be. Again like the nose I think it tastes its age or a little older as the oak notes have some complexity to them. I’m only getting a little bit of the standard wheater vibe from this one - there is minimal cinnamon that I am used to in the Buffalo Trace or Maker’s Mark library of wheated products. Honestly if I had this blind I would have a hard time guessing it’s a wheated bourbon which really makes me wonder about the mashbill here.
Thoughts: Good but nothing super memorable. In my hierarchy of wheated bourbons I would rank this above standard Maker’s Mark, around the same as standard Old Weller Antique and Weller 12, but below Maker’s Mark Cask Strength. The profile is completely different than all those other products which is helping it in the uniqueness category. I really hope availability increases as it is something I could go back to if it were easy to find.
Rating: B-

Monday, July 27, 2015

Bottled in Bond Bonanza (Reviews #100 - #110)

There’s a lot of negativity in the American Whiskey scene right now. The whiskey boom is in full swing with no end in sight. Distilleries are struggling to keep up with demand and as a result lots of products are now allocated, age statements are being dropped, and prices are rising. Yet despite all that, there is still one category of whiskey that nullifies each of those issues: Bottled in Bond.
Visit any decent liquor store and you’ll find swaths of bonded whiskey hiding on the bottom shelf in plain sight. Don’t let the bottom shelf status fool you though. The very nature of Bonded whiskey standards ensures a built in level of quality in age (4+ years), proof, and distillation that allow them to punch way above their weight class. The blue collar value proposition of it is the key to why I believe Bonded whiskey is America’s real gift to the alcohol world.
As such, I couldn’t think of a better way to celebrate 100 reviews than to shine a light on these (mostly) great whiskeys that you can find on shelves today for around $25 or less. Here is how I would rank them from first to last.
bottles

1st: Heaven Hill Bottled in Bond

bottle
Aged 6 years; $11; Distilled by Heaven Hill
One of many Heaven Hill products in this roundup that all derive from the same high corn mashbill. Unlike everything else in this series this bottle is the the only one that carries an age statement and is probably the oldest in the lineup. Like the Evan Williams and Old Heaven Hill it also claims to be charcoal filtered. I believe this is only distributed in Kentucky and Indiana which is a shame.
Nose: Nice balance of standard sweet oak flavors but nothing terribly exciting. The heat is very tempered.
Taste: Like the nose, a nice profile of the standard bourbon flavors you expect. Lots of sweet vanilla, a decent amount of oak, and only a little smoky bitterness. Any young corny notes have been pretty well smoothed out.
Thoughts: A solid, no bullshit, classical bourbon. At $11 this is probably the most impressive whiskey for the price I have ever encountered. This is an unbelievable value.
Rating: B / B-

2nd: Evan Williams Bottled in Bond

bottle
No Age Statement; $15; Distilled by Heaven Hill
I reviewed this one before and quite liked it but I thought I should re-evaluate it with fresh eyes for this roundup. It’s another Heaven Hill product so I expect it to be similar to those but this one also claims charcoal filtering so there could be some subtle differences.
Nose: Nose is pretty plain much like the rest of the others. Standard fruity corn and sweet oak. The heat isn’t overly aggressive which is good.
Taste: Again fairly standard but slightly more refined than the rest of the pack. Like the Old Heaven Hill I suspect that is the charcoal filtering. It doesn’t necessarily taste much older but there is less bitterness and the sweetness shines through more.
Thoughts: I still like this as much as the first time I reviewed it and feel it stands out against everything else. It’s a tremendous value, I’m still shocked you can buy a whiskey this good for $15.
Rating: B-

3rd: Very Old Barton Bottled in Bond

bottle
No Age Statement, $15, Distilled by Barton
One of the few non Heaven Hill Bonded bourbons available under $25. I previously reviewed this product and quite liked it however that review was for the age stated product. In a rather shitty move, Barton’s parent company Sazerac has since removed the words “aged” and “years” from the neck but left the number 6. It’s incredible deceptive but that’s a topic for another day.
Nose: Pretty standard nose of oak, sweet, corn, vanilla. A little bit of grapes and light antiseptic menthol notes.
Taste: A nice balanced standard bourbon profile - sweet, good amount of oak, and a slight spice bite. I think it has a little less bitter barrel char than I remember from the age stated product. Doesn’t taste noticeably younger than I remember the 6 year product but doesn’t taste noticeably older than the rest of the bottles either.
Thoughts: Nothing remarkable or standout here, just another classic bourbon. Magnificent value given the price. I haven’t had the age stated product in a while but I can’t really tell a significant decline in quality.
Rating: B-

4th: Old Fitzgerald Bottled in Bond

bottle
No Age Statement; $15; Distilled by Heaven Hill
Another Heaven Hill product but unlike the other high corn mashbill bourbons in the lineup this one uses wheat instead of rye as the secondary flavoring grain. As far as I know this is the only Bottle in Bond wheated bourbon currently for sale. I’m not a huge fan of the older version of this from Heaven Hill (Very Special Old Fitzgerald 12 year) so I had some trepidations going into this bottle. I believe this is rather hard to find outside of Kentucky.
Nose: The nose has some softer sweetness to it compared to the rest of the lineup. Think fresh baked wheat bread or a hefeweizen beer with a little funk and some dusty cardboard.
Taste: A lot like the nose. Much softer taste profile than the rest of the whiskeys in this series. Has some of the cinnamon zip I get in other wheated bourbon products but it’s pretty tame. Fairly sweet with an average amount of wood complexity.
Thoughts: Sweet and soft like a good wheater should be. I think this is much better than the 12 year product and at less than half the price it’s a much better buy.
Rating: B-

5th: Rittenhouse 100

bottle
No Age Statement; $27; Distilled by Heaven Hill
Rittenhouse is one of the most loved products under $30 that I can think of. It’s known for being something great to sip on but even more famous for making excellent cocktails. A lot of the reputation however was built during a time when distillation was being contracted out to Brown Forman. That’s certainly the era in which I grew to love Rittenhouse. There have been rumblings that the Heaven Hill distilled Rittenhouse isn’t quite as good.
Nose: Anise and menthol spice, stale rye bread, a little vanilla, and some oak. Heat is a little stronger than the rest of the pack.
Taste: Tastes a bit on the young side. I’m getting younger new mash corn and fruit notes like bananas. With that fruitiness there is some spice but it’s not heavy handed in the front or mid palate. It tastes more like high-rye bourbon than a low-rye rye until the finish which finally brings a bit more prickly rye spice to the party.
Thoughts: I think there is something to the notion that the old Brown Forman Rittenhouse was a little better. Another downside is the price on this just keeps going up. I remember when it was around $21 a bottle but now the average seems to be around $27. Having said that, it still makes excellent cocktails and is a staple in my manhattans and old fashioneds.
Rating: C+ / B-

6th: Old Heaven Hill Bottled in Bond

bottle
No Age Statement, $11, Distilled by Heaven Hill
Not much interesting to note about this other than it’s one of quite a few 75/13/12 corn/rye/barley Bonded offerings from Heaven Hill. Like a couple of other bottles here the label claims it is charcoal filtered. On a positive side, it’s extremely cheap.
Nose: Smells a bit older than four years even though I doubt it is. There is surprising amount of wood complexity and some sugary caramel.
Taste: Much like the nose. There is more depth of wood and sweet notes than I expected again. I’m a little shocked at how refined this tastes as it seems older than I imagine it actually is. I suspect all of this is due to the charcoal filtering.
Thoughts: A very solid offering and a wonderful value given the price point. It’s not tremendously complex but I like it.
Rating: C+

UPDATE 8/1/2015: I have since learned that this product has been discontinued. Bummer.

7th: J.T.S. Brown

bottle
No Age Statement, $11, Distilled by Heaven Hill
Not much to say about this other than it’s another Heaven Hill offering so it should taste a lot like the others. I don’t know about distribution but I think this is hard to find outside of Kentucky or Illinois.
Nose: Sweet, a little sourness, and some light spice.
Taste: Sweet and rye spice just like the nose but without the sour notes. There are some deeper wood and sweet notes on the back of the palate which is nice. Plenty of wood influence here.
Thoughts: It’s rather unmemorable but in this case that’s completely fine. It hits all the marks in the right places. Would make a fine daily sipper and the price is more than okay.
Rating: C+

8th: J.W. Dant

bottle
No Age Statement; $14; Distilled by Heaven Hill
Dant gets a lot of love on the /r/bourbon network (like this and this) for being a trusty go-to. Having said that, it’s another offering from Heaven Hill so it it should be similar to those products if somewhat more widely available outside Kentucky than the others.
Nose: Slight pepper spice notes and a little bit of sourness like the JTS Brown.
Taste: Sweet up front, decent amount of oak, a little smoky bitter char on the back.
Thoughts: Like most other products in this roundup it’s not overly complex but it doesn’t really need to be. A well rounded, solid budget pour.
Rating: C+

9th: Old Grand-Dad Bonded

bottle
No Age Statement, $17, Distilled by Beam
When the subject of a good value whiskey comes up, Old Grand-Dad is usually a popular suggestion. It has a higher rye content than all the other Bonded bourbons available so it serves a dual purpose as being good for cocktail duty as well.
Nose: Maple syrup and a fair amount of wood. A bit on the young side but not nearly as youthful as the standard Beam Bonded. Despite the high rye content I’m only getting a touch of spice notes.
Taste: Sweet, woody, and slightly spicy. Tastes a little young. There are some peanutty notes that are pretty common in Beam bourbons and sometimes referred to as Beam “funk”. The rye content is doing a good job of masking that funk with some nice spiciness.
Thoughts: I’m slowly coming around on some of the products in the Beam lineup and this is one of them. A fine pour and makes for a great base in a cocktail like an old fashioned.
Rating: C / C+

10th: Jim Beam Bonded

bottle
No Age Statement, $22; Distilled by Beam
Jim Beam Bonded is a relatively new offering in the Beam lineup. It’s essentially a 100 proof version of the standard Beam white label.
Nose: Corn, decent amount of oak, sweet young fruits. Smells like it’s younger than four years old as there lots of young new make fruity mash flavors present.
Taste: Tastes a lot like it smells. It’s got a lot of youth to it like the raw mashed corn flavors haven’t smoothed out enough yet. It does have a sweetness to it and surprisingly I get less of the typical funky Beam nutty yeast notes than I expected. The finish has hints of a darker malty sweetness but it’s pretty faint.
Thoughts: I’m having a hard time getting past how young it tastes. Combine that with the higher price point compared to the rest of the lineup and this one is a hard sell if you have access to others in this list. If not this is still a decent enough whiskey and certainly a step up from the regular white label.
Rating: C

11th: Mellow Corn

bottle
No Age Statement, $9; Distilled by Heaven Hill
Straight corn whiskey is interesting in that it has no requirement for aging in new oak barrels. As such, Mellow corn is aged for at least 4 years in second use barrels. This is immediately obvious from the color as it looks like a month old bourbon.
Nose: Mostly rubbing alcohol with a little bit of dried corn. Pretty thin on scents. Not much in the way of wood sugars / oak.
Taste: Tastes a little better than it smells. As expected the corn flavors are very dominate and the rubbing alcohol notes are still there, especially on the finish. There is some sweetness in the back of the palate, kind of like a corn taffy.
Thoughts: Really felt like I was taking one for the team including this in the roundup. It’s perhaps the most one dimensional whiskey I think I’ve ever tasted. It certainly is unique but I don’t know in a good way. On the flipside, it’s hard to be that negative when you consider a 750 will set you back less than $10.
Rating: D

As you can see there’s a lot of value to be had in these pours. Price isn’t really an indication of quality as the cheapest bourbon here actually ended up being my favorite. The middle of pack was really close - I would put JW Dant, Old Heaven Hill, and JTS Brown all about even. The only real downside about a lot of these is they are rather hard to find outside of the Kentucky area. Dant, Rittenhouse, and Old Grand-Dad are the exceptions to that and I think all fine offerings.
I hope I was able to do these great whiskeys some justice and convince anyone on the fence about them and give them a shot. Forget Pappy, save your money on a $14 bottle of Dant and enjoy other things beside chasing after insanely overhyped whiskey.

Sunday, May 11, 2014

Very Old Barton Bottled in Bond Review

Recently a local group of us hosted a blind tasting with a $25 and under price limit. My submission for that tasting was the bottle I am reviewing here today, Very Old Barton Bottled in Bond. Prior to purchasing the bottle for that blind tasting I had never had it before but my curiosity had been piqued due to a review by Sipp'n Corn and also news from Sku that Very Old Barton was keeping the number 6 on the label but dropping the "Aged" and "Years" verbiage. When I saw a bottle with an age statement I thought it would be a cool submission for the tasting so I grabbed it. While the competition wasn't very fierce in that tasting, overall I was pretty happy with how well it fared especially considering the price and what it lost to - Old Weller Antique 107. Now that the bottle is almost gone I thought I should get a formal review in so here we have it.

50.0% ABV; Aged 6 years; $14

Nose: Great up-front sweetness with vanilla, caramel sugar, and oak. Not overly hot. It has the intensity that you would expect from a bottle in bond offering.
Taste: More sweetness initially. Sweet corn and banana pudding complete with vanilla wafers. It's also got some grit too, though. There is some harsh barrel char towards the end, then some rye spice starts to come into play.
Finish: Short to medium finish with spicy rye initially as prominent as the sweetness and dry oak. Slightly disappointed that the finish doesn't last longer or leave a resounding sweetness.
Notes: This bottle was an eye opening experience for me in just how good a budget bourbon can be. It has lots of great sweetness, some rye bite, a respectable proof, and the price is very right. Honestly I'd love to see how this one would taste after a few more years in the wood to see if time would soften up some of the harshness a bit and add a little more depth/complexity.
Rating: B- / C+
Buy Recommendation: Yes. For $14, this one punches way above its weight class. At this price point not much can compete with this.