Thursday, July 20, 2017

Russell's Reserve Review

Launched in 2001, Russell's Reserve is named after Wild Turkey Master Distiller Jimmy Russell. While it originally entered the market at the same 101 proof of their flagship product, in 2005 it was lowered to 90 proof. I don't know for sure but I suspect that was due to problems maintaining higher proof aged stock given Wild Turkey's extremely low 107 barrel entry proof at the time. After recently covering the 13 year Wild Turkey Distiller's Reserve which I didn't love, I thought it would be interesting to see how a 10 year version with a similar proof stacks up.
bottle
Aged 10 years; 45% ABV; $35
Nose: Classic Wild Turkey rye baking spices, lots of oak, and sugary wood sweets (vanilla/caramel/etc). It has that bold modern Wild Turkey character and while it breaths a little warm you can tell it's not as amped up as the 101 product. Still pretty nice though.
Taste: Sadly, more muted than the nose. Honey and brown sugar sweets up front . Oak and spice take over in the finish along with some light dry cocoa powder. Tastes like what it should on paper - an older, watered down Wild Turkey 101. 
Thoughts: Like the 13 year Distiller's Reserve, the down proofing is really hampering this one. All of the hallmark modern Wild Turkey notes are there including those nice rye baking spices but it's just not very impactful. It lacks the bold punch of 101 and doesn't come close to the depth of the single barrel version but I actually like this better than the Distiller's Reserve. It's a decent sweet, spicy, woody combo that I'd put on par with a more expensive product like Blanton's and better than a harder to find product like Elmer T. Lee. At the price, that makes this a nice, solid, above average daily sipper.
Rating: C+ / B-
Note that price is not considered when assigning a rating.

Tuesday, July 11, 2017

Wild Turkey 13 Year Distiller's Reserve Review

Despite the lack of many regularly available age stated products in the states, Wild Turkey has continued to offer several of them in the export markets. Our overseas drinkers have steady access to 8 year 101 and in the past a 12 year 101 product was available as well. The 12 year 101 was discontinued in 2014, in part due to Wild Turkey's low 107 barrel entry proof which made maintaining a steady supply of 12 year product at 101 proof difficult. As a replacement, the export markets saw a product a year older but lower proof which is what we have here today.
bottle
Aged 13 years; 45.5% ABV; 2014 bottle code; thanks to /u/tnpoplar for the gift
Nose: Healthy amounts of oak, sugary sweetness, and some spice bite. Typical vanilla/caramel and baking spices. Smells like a moderately aged spicy bourbon. I would guess a little higher than 90ish proof from the nose.
Taste: Echoes the nose. Vanilla caramel sweets, some oak, and some baking spices in the finish. The viscosity is rather thin and the flavors aren't very impactful, I would guess lower than 91 proof by taste. The sweet notes seem to be the most dominate and mask the amount of wood depth I would expect in a 13 year old product.
Thoughts: This is alright. The promise of the 13 year age statement looks good on paper but the proofing down works more against it than the extra age helps it. Tasting it side by side with 2015 8 year 101 export, I much prefer the 8/101 of the two. The first time I had this was in a blind 5 way turkey shootout and this barely edged out Forgiven for next to last place. I think that pretty much says it all.
Rating: C+
Note that price is not considered when assigning a rating.

Monday, July 10, 2017

Hochstadter's Family Reserve 16 Year Rye Revew

Hochstadter's is a product from the Cooper Spirits Company who have been putting out sourced ryes in a variety of different forms. Today we have their latest high end offering which is a cask strength, 16 year old, 100% rye that was distilled in Canada. 100% rye from Canada almost always means Alberta Distillers which is where a few other popular ryes such as WhistlePig are sourced. I was initially skeptical about this for a couple of reasons, mostly the high price but also because the Lock Stock & Barrel rye which is also from Cooper Spirits has less than favorable reviews. I really like aged rye and Alberta rye, especially at cask strength so I was willing to give it a chance.
bottle
Aged 16 years; 61.9% ABV; $200
Nose: Spicy and very warm. Spearmint, menthol, wintergreen, sugary bubblegum. Definitely smells like a well aged, cask strength, super high rye whiskey.
Taste: Lots of sweet charred oak sugars with a big spice blast in the finish. The range of spices is all over the place, everything from dill to wintergreen to spearmint to baking spices. The age is certainly evident as its got a wide range of oak and the sweet notes that imparts. The high proof comes through very heavy handed as all the spice, sweet, and oak notes are very bold. Overall, it's a sweet woody spice party.
Thoughts: Not only is this an exceptionally good whiskey, it's also a great rye whiskey. In fact, I think this is better than last year's Booker's Rye which was a really good whiskey but not a great rye. This is coming from someone who likes spicy wood bombs though so take that for what it is worth. The real question here is, is this worth the retail cost? If you are asking that question, then the answer is probably no. My advice is to split a bottle with some friends and try it for yourself. I did that and felt it was good enough to splurge on a bottle for myself. It may not be the best value out there but cask strength hyper aged ryes aren't getting more plentiful or cheaper as the years go by. So yeah, the pricing isn't great. Yet two months after release here there are still some of these sitting on the shelves. I can waltz right down to a number of locals and buy as many of these as I want. No hassle, no chase, no calling in any favors that count towards the limited number I am comfortable with asking for these days. To me, this is like buying a car at Carmax. Yeah, you pay a lot more but you don't have to deal with all the fucking bullshit drama leading up to getting the car at a better price.
Rating: B+ / A-
Note that price is not considered when assigning a rating. 

Sunday, July 9, 2017

Rabbit Hole PX Sherry Finished Bourbon Review

Rabbit Hole is an upstart craft distillery that is currently contract distilling at New Riff Distillery in Newport KY. Eventually they plan to move to their own distillery in Louisville which is currently in the early stages of construction. Earlier this year a few products from them hit stores - a two year old Kentucky Straight Bourbon, a two year old Kentucky Straight Rye, and finally a wheated bourbon that was finished in PX Sherry casks. Two year old craft whiskey is always a hard pass but I like wheated bourbon and I like PX sherry finishes so I figured I would give it a shot. For those interested here is the fact sheet including the mash bills and ages that was sent to my local store when they received this. Interesting to note that while both two year old products say Kentucky and I assume their contract distillate, the wheated finished product does not. According to what I've read, the wheated bourbon was sourced from Wyoming Whiskey.
bottle
No Age Statement (though marketing materials say 5+ years); 46.5% ABV; Batch 02, Bottle 1207; $68
Nose: Cereal grains and fruity grape jam. The high proponent of malted wheat and malt barley is making this smell more like a sherry finished Scotch than a sherry finished wheated bourbon.
Taste: A lot like the nose with the cereal grain and fruity sherry notes dominating. There is a decent amount of oak influence with some wood sweets but there is an underlying weird craft funk to it. I get the same kind of grassy, earthy, dirty corn vibe that I get in Garrison Brothers which I loathe. The finish has some cinnamon spice which I think is finally the wheated element coming through but also still some rough unfinished new make ethanol. Tasting blind I would have guessed a young craft sherry finished malt whiskey, maybe something like Westland.
Thoughts: When I first opened this the rough craft funk was overwhelming - it was like grassy grains and grapes. Those notes have tapered back and now I can actually taste other things but this is still headed in the wrong direction. It tastes more like a young craft malt whiskey and has barely any semblance of an aged wheated bourbon. Considering the price, this is a total flop.
Rating: D
Note that price is not considered when assigning a rating. 

Saturday, July 8, 2017

W.L. Weller 12 Year Review

W.L. Weller, the 12 year old wheated bourbon from Buffalo Trace. Though it was once easy to find, due to the great wheater famine (© /u/MajorHop), it's now about as hard to find as the Pappy Van Winkle for which it was supposed to be an obtainable alternative. For all intents and purposes it is the same as Van Winkle bourbon but lived its life in a warehouse location that isn't preferred by them. Over the years I've watched it go from a bottle I could buy whenever I wanted to being held behind the counter to now being saved for Fall lotteries at high markup prices. Even crazier than that is it now commands hundreds of dollars on the secondary market. There have been a lot of surprising turns in bourbon over my years in the hobby but seeing Weller 12 as a secondary item is definitely one of the higher ups in the WTF category. 
bottle
Aged 12 years; 45% ABV; 2015 bottle code; $30
Nose: Lots of oak and lots of sweet flavors like vanilla cake batter. The wood has quite a bit of depth. It smells like a nice, older, proofed-down wheated bourbon. 
Taste: Honey, carrot cake frosting, and lots of oak. The range of oak runs from bitter dark chocolate all the way through to sweet honey notes. Finish lingers about as long as you'd expect for 90 proof with a little wheat / wood spice and dark cocoa. 
Thoughts: There's a reason why when this was readily available at under $30 that it was a goto - it's an easy to drink combo of very sweet and heavily woody. I've had ups and downs with batches over the years, some I thought were overly bitter but this is right in line with my fonder memories of this product. All that out of the way, get the fuck out of here if you think this is worth anything close to what it's going for on the secondary. It was a great budget wheated bourbon and that's still what it is. There are plenty of products that are much easier to get that are just as good or better than this - Rebel Yell 10 year, Russell's Reserve Single Barrel, Four Roses Single Barrel, and Old Forester 1920 all come to mind. Granted, only the Rebel Yell in that bunch is wheated with a similar profile but for fucks sake the bourbon world doesn't revolve around wheaters.
Rating: B / B-
Note that price is not considered when assigning a rating.

Friday, July 7, 2017

Angel's Envy Review

The community reviews over on /r/bourbon have taken a back to basics turn for the last couple of installments so here we go again with a bottle I normally wouldn't have on hand. 
Angel's Envy started as the brainchild of former Woodford Reserve Master Distiller Lincoln Henderson. Up until recently they've been strictly using the sourcing model for their products but last year their distillery finally came online. It will be quite a few years before that distillate is of age so what we are tasting today was made elsewhere. Officially the source of Angel's Envy has never been confirmed but I've read that it's a blend of 6 year old bourbon from 3 different Kentucky distilleries. From that point, the bourbon is then aged in port wine casks for an additional few months which the most distinguishing feature of the brand.
bottle
No Age Statement; 43.3% ABV; Currently retails here at $47, this 100ml mini was $10
Nose: Popcorn, vanilla, light grapes, and typical bourbon charred oak. Smells like a standard young to moderately aged bourbon that's been finished in port barrels. The ethanol is a little overpowering consider the middling proof. 
Taste: A lot like the nose but with more grape port influence. It's like bourbon with a touch of grape soda added, or grape jelly and popcorn. It's pretty light on flavor with not a lot of body and a short finish. On the plus side, it's incredibly easy to drink and I can't help but think of the cringeworthy descriptor of "smooth".
Thoughts: As someone who is into bold, bash you in the face flavors and cask strength whiskey, I don't like this. I find it overly light and too rounded which I attribute both to the lowish proof and the port finishing. Having said that, this is probably a very good whiskey for a casual/novice drinker as it's very soft and easy to drink. Though it's not a very good value, for me when it comes to Angel's Envy, the limited edition cask strength version is the way to go.
Rating: D+
Note that price is not considered when assigning a rating.

Thursday, July 6, 2017

Willett 3 Year Small Batch Rye Review

I have a long history with Willett but the majority of my fondness for them comes from the days of being able to buy their sourced Family Estate single barrels right off my local's shelf for $55. Those days are long gone and now you're lucky to be graced with the opportunity to pay $200 for a bottle at their gift shop. Here lately however there have been some more affordable though much younger products released from them that were distilled in house. Thus far I've had ups and downs with their self distilled products - while I liked the Old Bardstown Bottled in Bond and a Family Estate Single Barrel 4 year, I absolutely hated the 2 year small batch rye they put out last year. I found that product so hot, raw, and undrinkable that I drain poured it. I had heard the 3 year rye was better but I went into this bottle with a lot of hesitation.
bottle
Aged 3 years; 56.4% ABV; thanks to /u/unbreakablesausage for the secret santa gift
Nose: Hot and spicy. Spearmint, pine, menthol, and a bit more sugary wood sweetness than I'd expect for 3 years old. It leans young as the grainy new make notes are detectable and the ethanol is a little untamed.
Taste: Sweet and spicy. Less ethanol forward than the nose but also a bit less spicy and bit more sweet than the nose. Sugary wood sweets, pine, spearmint, and a little rough grainy new make. The finish is a little short considering the proof and I suppose that's due to the relatively young age. What is noticeably absent that tends to plague most craft products is the lack of any weird funky off notes that don't belong in a bourbon or rye whiskey. 
Thoughts: This is a tremendous improvement over the 2 year rye and shows promise. I can't wait to see what their products taste like with more age. Considering that a lot of craft distillery upstarts are putting out stuff as old as this that tastes like garbage, it seems Willett is one of the few that actually has a promising future ahead of them. 
Rating: C+ / C
Note that price is not considered when assigning a rating.

Wednesday, July 5, 2017

Abraham Bowman Coffee Finished Bourbon Review

Abraham Bowman is a limited release product from the A. Smith Bowman Distillery which is currently owned by the Sazerac Company. Over the years Bowman has put out some eyebrow raising products under the line, some of which include an 18 year old cask strength wheated bourbon, a gingerbread beer finished bourbon, a vanilla bean infused bourbon, and the recently released Gingerbread Cocoa Finished bourbon. Eyebrow raising is probably an understatement because there is some wacky shit in that list for sure. I've had both amazing and bad experiences with the line but here today is another one that I would put in the LOL WTF category. From what I recall, the story here is that a local coffee roaster stored some of their beans in former Bowman barrels. Bowman then reclaimed those barrels and finished bourbon in them. It was limited to Virginia only but thanks to a friendly bourbon group I was able to get my hands on a bottle.
bottle
No Age Statement but 9 years based on distilled/bottled; 67.3% ABV; $73
Nose: Hot, woody, boozy coffee. I don't know if it's the ethanol or mash but there is a lot of angry, spicy heat. It smells like a barrel proof coffee liqueur. 
Taste: Everything from the nose only with more coffee influence. It is a bomb of sweet woody flavors, heat, and coffee. Like the nose it tastes like a barrel proof coffee liqueur - it's really incredible how much coffee flavor this has just from being finished in barrels that once held coffee beans. The viscosity is about as thick as you'd expect a 9ish year old 134 proof whiskey which is to say it's chewy. Again not sure if it's the ethanol or mash but there is a lot of aggressive heat spice. 
Thoughts: Whew, this one is a bruiser and not for the faint of heart. I've probably sampled out more of this bottle than I've drank and overall the crowd reactions seem split almost 50/50 on love/hate. The main negatives I can see are that it's hot, brash, and insanely coffee forward. As a whiskey voyeur/masochist who really enjoys aggressive cask strength bourbon, coffee, and sweet syrupy flavors, to me those characteristics are stars rather than flaws making this one of the craziest and most unique things I've ever tasted. 
Rating: A-
Note that price is not considered when assigning a rating. 

Friday, June 30, 2017

Lot 40 Review

Here's a whisky I don't know a lot about and normally wouldn't have sought out but it was bequeathed to me in /u/tvraisedme's gigantic whiskey dumpster give away before he moved out of town. I've read a lot of hoopla about the 2012 batch of this product but my bottle does not bear the "2012 Limited Release" distinction that I've seen in those reviews. All I know is that it was given to me in 2015 so I am guessing it is that release of the product. I did find some information that stated the 2015 release was basically the same distillation run as the 2012 only aged a little longer. If that's true, that makes this a Canadian rye whiskey distilled from 90% rye and 10% malted rye but I've found conflicting reports about the age so we'll just safely assume it's a NAS blend.
bottle
No Age Statement; 43% ABV; Currently retails here at $55
Nose: Sweet, spicy, and a little mellow. Molasses, vanilla, honey. The rye spice is rather herbal, like eucalyptus and menthol. I'm used to much more higher proof whiskeys and this doesn't bowl me over but it does have a surprising amount of aroma for only 43%.
Taste: Very sweet forward - mostly brown sugar and honey. The spice seems way dialed back from the nose and is washed out by the sweetness. It's thin on body and I can't help but feel like there is a weird artificial note to the sweet flavors that lingers in the back palate. The finish is a bit dry and short which seems to be the 86 proof rearing its ugly head. 
Thoughts: I'm not crazy about this. If the palate carried through all those spice notes from the nose I would be more of fan. Also the weird artificial sweet note I can't quite place is not helping things. For my money when it comes to ryes, I prefer a more wood and spice forward profile like the higher proof WhistlePig bottlings sourced from Alberta.
Rating: C+ / C
Note that price is not considered when assigning a rating.

Thursday, June 29, 2017

William Larue Weller 2005, 2006, and 2016 Reviews

William Larue Weller, the cask strength wheated bourbon behemoth released as part of the Buffalo Trace Antique Collection. I've covered several vintages before but have been holding on to a couple special samples from the early days of its release and figured now was a good a time as any to review them. For reference, I'm also including my own bottle of the 2016 release for some side by side action. Of note here, 2005 is the first release of William Larue Weller. Prior to that it was just Weller at 19 years old and only 90 proof. The 2006 release is often regarded as something of legend - due to its age and given distillery timelines, there is the belief it is actually stock from Stitzel Weller. Given the jackoffery for Stitzel bourbons you can only imagine the foaming at the mouth for a 15 year old cask strength version. Give my experience with these and how hot / high proof they are I know they are murderers row for your palate so my biggest intrigue here is whether the 2006 stands out above the rest. 
bottle
bottles

William Larue Weller 2005

Aged 12 years; 60.95% ABV; thanks to /u/02camaroSS for the sample
Nose: Rather muted for 122 proof but has some sugary wheated bourbon sweetness. Smells like lightly wooded caramel cake batter with a little wheat spice zip.
Taste: Rather light and again does not drink at all like 122 proof. It's mostly all wood sweets and fruits, like a honey caramel covered apple. The finish doesn't last long.
Thoughts: This isn't bad but by William Larue Weller standards it is very disappointing. I highly suspect this one has oxidized over the years because it's way thinner and easier to drink than it should be. The wheated bourbon notes are there but all in all it just tastes like Weller 12 with about the same depth and heat. Take this review with a grain of salt because I feel like something is not right here.
Rating: B-

William Larue Weller 2006

Aged 12 years; 64.95% ABV; thanks to /u/ShooterFlatch for proxing this sample
Nose: Wow. So dark and rich - heavy wood influence and heavy sweet tones. I've talked about how some dusties I've tried before have a rich, compacted, condensed flavor profile and this certainly smells that way. On top of all the lush sweet and wood there is dark sugary cherries and prunes. 
Taste: Not quite as shocking as the nose but it's close. Massive wood notes and heavy sweet notes as well as some old dusty bourbon notes. Wood and wheat spice are there in droves from start to finish along with dark booze soaked cherries and cake batter. It's incredibly chewy, almost like eating bourbon. Totally drinkable for the proof, the intense flavor is all there but the heat isn't overpowering. 
Thoughts: I was skeptical this would stand out but I am happy to be wrong. A master class bourbon, among the best I've had. I have no idea if this is Stitzel Weller or not but I don't care - it's certainly the best William Laure Weller I've ever had by a long shot. 
Rating: A

William Larue Weller 2016

Aged 12 years; 67.6% ABV;
Nose: Pretty dense but not as compact as the 2006. The flavor profile is the same as the 2006, wood heavy and sweet heavy with some boozed soaked red/dark fruits. It's a really nice nose, just not as condensed as the 2006.
Taste: Just like the nose and again very similar to the 2006 just not as deep. It's mostly all wood, wheat spice, and sugary cherry cake notes. The spice and heat is a little more out of control though and it feels a bit rougher for the proof though it is the highest ABV here. It has a slightly younger wood vibe than the 2006 but still has a great amount of wood depth. The finish goes on for quite a while with woody dark chocolate cinnamon spice heat.
Thoughts: Really good stuff and though I am usually a Stagg man, I am glad I went with the Weller in 2016 after having tasting them both. Going off memory this is as good as or better than a lot of William Larue Weller vintages.
Rating: A-
Note that price is not considered when assigning a rating. 

Update 7/1: For what it's worth, the Buffalo Trace Antique Collection spec sheet states the 2006 William Larue Weller was distilled by the Buffalo Trace Distillery in Frankfort. Thanks to @bourbonnooga for pointing that out. There are however comments like this one on straightbourbon.com that quote Buffalo Trace employees as stating a Stitzel Weller provenance. We'll probably never know for sure.